Sexual Misconduct Disciplinary Actions

CAUTION: The content of this webpage may not be appropriate for all audiences.

This page contains descriptions of sexual misconduct that may be triggering to some individuals. Click here to return to the home page.

***You do not have to tell law enforcement or your commander about your sexual assault in order to receive care or assistance***

If you are in need of immediate and confidential assistance, please visit https://safehelpline.org/nearme or chat live with someone now. For additional information, visit the DAF SAPR page.

The following data includes brief descriptions of sexual misconduct followed by disciplinary actioon issued to the guilty party. Outcomes are grouped by year and sorted by month.

Disciplinary Action Issued For Sexual Misconduct

  • 2025

    Incirlik Air Base

    Disciplinary Actions Related to Sexual Harassment and Sexual Assault

    Reporting Period 1 February – 31 March 2025

     

    Results of Courts-Martial

    No qualifying offenses were disposed of by courts-martial during the reporting period.

    Nonjudicial Punishment

    No qualifying offenses were disposed by nonjudicial punishment during the reporting period.

    Administrative Action

    No qualifying offenses were disposed of by administrative action during the reporting period.

    Administrative Discharge

    No qualifying offenses were disposed of by administrative discharge during the reporting period.

     

    Dec 2024-Jan 2025

    No qualifying offenses were disposed of by Courts-Martial, Nonjudicial Punishment, Administrative Action, or administrative discharge during the reporting period. 

  • 2023

    December

    No qualifying offenses were disposed of by Courts-Martial, Nonjudicial Punishment, Administrative Action, or administrative discharge during the reporting period. 

    November

    Sexual Harassment, Article 134, UCMJ – A Staff Sergeant sexually harassed a Senior Airman in their flight by making inappropriate comments of a sexual nature about the Senior Airman’s appearance. The Staff Sergeant also sent inappropriate comments of a sexual nature in a group message to members of their unit. The Staff Sergeant received an admonishment for this misconduct.

    Sexual Harassment, Article 134, UCMJ – A Technical Sergeant sexually harassed others in his unit by making multiple comments that were of a sexual nature. The member also asked fellow flight members to rate the attractiveness of various individuals depicted in photos, which created a hostile work environment. The Technical Sergeant received a reprimand for his misconduct.